From patient-derived evidence to mechanistic models
Central question. Is neutrophil C4 protein a direct contributor to disease (a therapeutic target) or a consequence of it (a biomarker)?
To test whether neutrophil C4 is a driver of synaptic pathology, our work moves from patient-derived evidence toward mechanistic models.
Human evidence
We are confirming the neutrophil C4–synaptic density correlation in a larger cohort and performing deep proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of neutrophils from schizophrenia and control donors.
Mechanistic models
We are detailing the role of C4 protein in neutrophils using a neutrophil cell line and isolated primary neutrophils, and determining the molecular signals required for neutrophils to modify synapses in a genetically engineered iPSC-based in vitro model.
These experiments address long-standing field questions: whether peripheral immune activation detrimentally impacts the brain, and whether inhibiting neutrophil activation confers therapeutic benefit.